Case Study  /  Enterprise Security  ·  Concept Pitch  ·  2016

Netwala — Threat Intelligence Dashboard

A proof-of-concept security operations console built to win the work: could one screen tell an analyst what to look at first, out of 575 open threats?

Role
Design Lead
Team
n designers
Owned
Framing · IA · Interaction
Status
POC / Pitch
Netwala threat intelligence dashboard — dark UI showing open threat counts, a server-topology bubble map, anomaly split, attacks by geography and highest-risk hosts

Server lens, 24-hour window. Threat volume mapped onto infrastructure topology rather than listed in a table — bubble size carries magnitude, position carries location in the estate.

Band 01

Time as a control, not a preset — a scrubbable 24h range sits above everything it filters.

Band 02

Volume summary ordered by kill-chain progression: recon → suspected compromise → attack → anomaly.

Band 03

The pivot canvas. Same data, three lenses: Threat, Source IP, Server.

Band 04

Supporting evidence — open/closed split, attack geography, highest-risk hosts, each dismissible.

The Process
  1. The problem behind the brief

    The ask was "a security dashboard." The real problem was triage under volume: analysts were reading log tables to find the one host that mattered. Pattern recognition was being done by a human doing a machine's job.

  2. Framing with the team

    We reduced the analyst's first thirty seconds to three questions — how bad, where, who — and made them the design's organising constraint. Everything that didn't answer one of the three came off the screen.

  3. The structural decision

    Three questions became three lenses over one canvas — Threat, Source IP, Server — instead of three destinations in a nav. The analyst changes what they're looking through, never where they are.

  4. The core interaction move

    Replacing the server table with a spatial topology map. Bubbles sized by threat volume, grouped by tier — database, application, web, proxy, FTP. Concentration becomes visible before a single number is read.

  5. Visual system

    Dark canvas, one accent. Orange is reserved exclusively for signal — threat, severity, active state — and denied to everything else. On a screen watched for hours, colour restraint is the alerting mechanism.

  6. Direction & handoff

    I set the framing, IA and interaction model, then ran critique as the team built out the lens states, empty states and tooltip layer to pitch fidelity. Outcome — add the result here: won account / led to X.

Three decisions that carried the design

Restraint as an alerting system

A single accent on a greyscale field means severity reads pre-attentively — before the analyst consciously scans. Decorative colour would have cost the product its most important signal.

Pivot, don't navigate

Threat / Source IP / Server swap the lens in place. Investigation is a train of thought; a page load breaks it. The tab pattern kept context intact through the pivot.

Shape before number

The topology map lets volume register as pattern, not as a value to be compared. The exact count is still available on demand — it just isn't the price of admission.